The Spanish "company" would be translated into Latin as societas like in socius, a partner or comrade. From this came "Society of Jesus" SJ by which they would be known more widely. Ignatius of Loyola and his followers appropriated the name of Jesus for their new order, provoking resentment by other religious who considered it presumptuous.
On January 27, he signed an executive order at the Pentagon on refugees and visa holders from designated nations. Construction of a Border Wall and Additional Border Patrol Personnel Section 4 of the border security executive order directs DHS to take steps to obtain operational control of the US-Mexico border by planning, designing and constructing a wall along the length of the border.
It also directs DHS to allocate unused funding for the purpose of constructing a wall and to undertake a comprehensive study on the security of the southern border within days.
Adding 5, more Border Patrol agents along the border would increase the number of agents to about 25, more than triple the number of agents in The executive order does not explain why the additional agents are needed.
Increased Construction of Detention Facilities and Detention of Father pedro arrupe essay Section 5 of the order directs DHS to immediately construct detention facilities at or near the southern border and to assign asylum officers and immigration judges to the facilities to conduct asylum interviews and hearings.
The executive order does not Father pedro arrupe essay the source of funding for the construction of detention facilities, which can cost tens of millions of dollars, money which will go to private detention companies.
The use of detention for asylum-seekers has been shown to limit their access to due process. This policy would also require the detention of women and children, which has been challenged in court. The use of alternatives to detentionparticularly community-based models involving nongovernmental organizations, has proven to be more humane, cost-effective, and beneficial to the court system.
These programs also afford immigrants better access to counsel and to know your rights presentations. Studies have shown that expedited removal is often applied incorrectly by enforcement personnel and that asylum-seekers are not allowed to adequately communicate their fear in such situations or, even if they do express fear, are simply denied a credible fear interview, leading to their return and peril.
The training of DHS personnel on child provisions is needed, but should be conducted by child welfare experts, who also should assist border patrol in making those determinations. Assessments should be made of all children, including Mexican children. Many large cities, such as New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, as well as smaller cities and communities, have chosen not to cooperate with federal authorities in enforcing immigration laws, including participation in the Secure Communities and Section g programs.
This presumes that other funding, such as Community Block grants, could be withheld. Secure Communities and Section glaunched during the George W.
Bush administration, have been criticized as eroding cooperation between local law enforcement officials and immigrants and their communities, which would be hesitant to report crimes to law enforcement officials who could detain and deport them.
Under the Secure Communities program, immigrants with minor offensessuch as loitering, have been deported. Under Section glocal enforcement officials, untrained in immigration law, have repeatedly violated the civil rights of legal residents.
Enforcement Priorities Section 5 expands the priority list of noncitizens subject to deportation to anyone charged of a criminal offense, who committed acts that constitute a criminal offense, who engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation, who has abused any program related to public benefits, who is subject to a final order of removal, but has not departed, or who otherwise poses a risk to public safety.
Despite the vow by President Trump to prioritize criminals for deportation, the executive order is so broad that anyone who committed even a minor offense, such as a traffic violation or jaywalking, could be deported. The order also applies to those who may have misrepresented their status to obtain work.
Combined, the two executive orders on immigration enforcement provide a blueprint to use all available resources and authority to deport as many undocumented persons as possible.
This would no doubt lead to an unprecedented separation of families, including families with US-citizen children. Suspension of Visas to Certain Countries and Extreme Vetting Section 3 of the executive order suspends the issuance of visas to countries designated as being detrimental to the interests of the United States for 90 days, listing Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen.
Section 4 requires implementation of uniform screening standards for all immigration programs, to include assessments such as whether an individual is a risk, will be a positive contributor to the nation, and has the ability to make contributions in the national interest.
The countries listed for suspension of visas are Muslim-majority, while other nations that have experienced terrorism have not been listed. This suggests that the executive order is targeting Muslim immigrants. The implementation of a screening program in Section 4 is subjective and could lead to discrimination against certain religions and persons of certain income levels.
Suspension of the US Refugee Program and the Ban on Syrian Refugees Section 5 of the executive order suspends the US resettlement program for days while a review is made to ensure that refugees are being adequately screened for national security purposes.
The program will be restored only if the Secretary of State, the Secretary of DHS, and the Director of National Intelligence agree that sufficient safeguards are in place. The order also reduces the number of refugees admitted into the United States to 50, for FYdown fromset by the Obama Administration.
In addition, it suspends the resettlement of Syrian refugees indefinitely. According to security experts, refugees who enter through the US Refugee program are the most vetted entrants into the United States, going through multiple security screenings before entry into the country, a process that can take as long as two years.
The conflation of refugees as threats to national security is a tactic used to reduce the number of refugees admitted to the United States. Banning Syrians from resettlement and suspending visa issuance to nationals of Muslim-majority nations will also certainly be used as a recruiting tool by terrorist groups, who will claim these measures prove that the United States is hostile to Islam.
Syrian refugees are fleeing the persecution of extremist groups like ISIS and require protection as much as any refugee group at this time. The exception for those who face religious persecution, according to President Trump, applies to Christian minorities in the Middle East, but also, given the language, could apply to other religious minorities, such as Rohingya in Myanmar, who are Muslim in a majority Buddhist country.
While Christian refugees in the Middle East should be protected, either in the region or in a third country, it should not preclude the resettlement of Muslims, who also are top targets of extremist groups.
Some faith leaders in the Middle East, including Catholic bishopsoppose the resettlement of their Christian populations, because they fear it will lead to a diminishment of their local Christian communities. The executive order on refugees, wrapped in national security language, will make the United States less secure.
It will give extremist groups a propaganda tool for recruitment; encourage other nations to abdicate their responsibilities to refugees and other vulnerable populations; and will alienate millions of Muslims, both in the United States and abroad, who otherwise would be allies and important sources of counter-terror and law enforcement intelligence.
This stance will harm its moral standing in the world, and limit its ability to influence other nations to collaborate with it on humanitarian and other initiatives.Fr Arturo Sosa SJ, Superior General of the Society of Jesus, has announced the beginning of the process towards possible beatification of Father Pedro Arrupe SJ, who is going to be considered from now on a "Servant of God".
While the calling to be men and women for others invites us to serve others, the implications of this action are far greater than they may first seem. First and foremost, this phrase invites us to love others because such service cannot be achieved without a genuine love for the people whom we are serving.
The Fr. Pedro Arrupe, SJ Writing Challenge is an opportunity for students to express in writing what principle or personal ethic is a driving factor in their lives. It is meant to publicly recognize young people who reflect upon and write about their personal beliefs and values through the lens of Location: Utica Street.
Aa, Abraham Jacob van der (), letterkundige XIV ; Biographisch Woordenboek der Nederlanden () XIV 75, ; Aafjes, Bertus (), schrijver XII XIII , , ; Het gevecht met de Muze () XIII ‘De dichter van de sarcophaag’ (essay ) XIII , , De dichter van de sarcophaag en andere opstellen () XIII The Society of Jesus (SJ – from Latin: Societas Iesu) is a scholarly religious congregation of the Catholic Church which originated in sixteenth-century yunusemremert.com members are called Jesuits.
The society is engaged in evangelization and apostolic ministry in nations on six continents. Jesuits work in education (founding schools, colleges, universities, and seminaries), intellectual. Father Pedro Arrupe Essay examples - His Mission Father Pedro Arrupe was truly a man of God, born to lead the Jesuit’s to greatness.
Born in Bilbao, Spain, he .