With regards to the new Marvel et al paper, I find that: First, the fact that global climatemodels project more positive climate feedbacks in the future does not in any way prove that the models are correct in doing so.
School of Social and Administrative Studies, University of Wales, Cardiff Abstract In this paper we address a number of contemporary themes concerning the analysis of qualitative data and the ethnographic representation of social realities.
A contrast is drawn. On the one hand, a diversity of representational modes and devices is currently celebrated, in response to various critiques of conventional ethnographic representation.
On the other hand, the widespread influence of computer- assisted qualitative data analysis is promoting convergence on a uniform mode of data analysis and representation often justified with reference to grounded theory.
We note the ironic contrast between these two tendencies, the heterodox and the orthodox, Sociological imagination paper contemporary qualitative research.
We go on to suggest that there exist alternatives that reflect both the diversity of representational approaches, and the broader possibilities of contemporary computing. We identify the technical and intellectual possibilities of hypertext software as offering just one such synthesis.
In recent years there has emerged a dual process of destabilization: In the course of this discussion, we explore some aspects of this diversity and their consequences. We do not, incidentally, believe that it is necessary to endorse the rhetoric and the most extreme formulations of postmodern inquiry in order to take seriously the issues we discuss.
Indeed, we believe that although the postmodernist turn has often provided the inspiration, earlier, more classical, versions of sociological or anthropological understanding furnish justifications for the exploration of ethnographic representation.
The methodological domain is marked by a clamour of styles and justifications. Not only is there diversity, there are also subversive and transgressive tendencies.
We cannot Sociological imagination paper only in terms of contrast and complementarity in research methods and strategies: Contemporary ethnography certainly cannot be seen as an unproblematic set of procedures for data collection.
Indeed, it cannot be seen as a purely methodological category. The ethnographic enterprise now carries with it connotations of theoretical, epistemological and ethical controversy. We cannot remain innocent about the methods of data collection for social and cultural exploration, or the methods we use to reconstruct and represent social worlds.
Centrifugal forces have given rise to a multiplicity of standpoints. One can now identify an almost carnivalesque variety of approaches, sometimes inspired by a departure from former analytic traditions.
Throughout those various standpoints runs a discursive turn, treating as central but problematic the relations of language, knowledge and power. Many of these perspectives indeed give rise to analyses that render ethnography itself, at least in any conventional mode, highly problematic, if not all-but-impossible.
We discuss those tendencies in more detail later in this paper. We contrast them with a countervailing tendency in contemporary ethnographic research.
In contrast to the centrifugal, fragmentary movement alluded to, there is a centripetal tendency: One can detect a trend towards a homogenization, and the emergence of a new form of orthodoxy, especially at the level of data management.
We note that the use of microcomputing strategies for qualitative data handling has become widespread, and this includes an almost globalizing process within the research community.
The presuppositions and procedures that are inscribed in contemporary software for qualitative data analysis are implicitly driving a renewed orthodoxy that is being adopted in a large number of research sites around the world.
In a subsequent section of this paper, therefore, we review some aspects of this emergent orthodoxy.
Sociology and Sociological Imagination. 2, words. 5 pages. A Comparison of the Sociological Imagination and Sociological Perspective. 1, words. 3 pages. An Introduction to the Analysis of Sociological Imagination. words. 1 page. An Essay on Sociological Imagination. words. 2 . Paper Grade: 75 / C The Sociological Imagination The sociological imagination is an idea or a way of thinking that interlocks an individual in a society with the society as a whole. Most people refer to sociology as the study of how people or individuals interact with each other. CASTES IN INDIA: Their Mechanism, Genesis and Development. by B. R. Ambedkar. Paper presented at an Anthropology Seminar taught by Dr. A. A. Goldenweizer.
This is not a comprehensive review of that particular field of methodological development. For the purposes of this paper, we focus on the commonalities and analytic implications of such data-handling techniques.
Here we are not concerned primarily with evaluating all the contemporary models, not to advocate one or other approach in itself.
We follow the approach we adopt in order to lay out and explore this one major tension or paradox within current methodological discourse and practice. In the third part of this paper we explore briefly the implication another, third, strategy that provides a degree of synthesis between our contrasted ideal types.
Contestation and the Ethnographic Representation of Culture 2. Emerging most starkly within the discipline of anthropology, such debates have now spread to sociology and the ethnographic endeavour in general.
At the centre of such debates is the critical appraisal of ethnographic writing and the social production of the ethnographic text.
The anthropological monograph, therefore, was the culmination of the ethnography and the legitimizing mark of the anthropologist.
The relationships between fieldwork, text production and the discipline of anthropology have, then, developed over time.
The anthropologist was identified with his or her people, who in turn were identified with and in the ethnography.
The ethnographic monograph thus became the embodiment of the discipline itself and the identiifier of its practitioners. Within the classical period of British and American anthropology the ethnographic monograph enshrined a series of standardized representations of societies and by implication of their authors Boon, There are, of course, other modes of ethnographic representation, including film; they are as conventional and artful as any written text cf.My Sociological Imagination Essay Sample The term sociological imagination was created by the American sociologist C.
Wright Mills to denote the perception of the relationship that exists between an individual's specific life experience and the broader society (Mills, ). My Sociological Imagination Essay Sample The term sociological imagination was created by the American sociologist C. Wright Mills to denote the perception of the relationship that exists between an individual's specific life experience and the broader society (Mills, ).
Paper Grade: 75 / C The Sociological Imagination The sociological imagination is an idea or a way of thinking that interlocks an individual in a society with the society as a whole. Most people refer to sociology as the study of how people or individuals interact with each other.
Paper Grade: 75 / C The Sociological Imagination The sociological imagination is an idea or a way of thinking that interlocks an individual in a society with the society as a whole.
Most people refer to sociology as the study of how . Although it appears to be a common social behavior, very little is known about the nature of bullshitting (i.e., communicating with little to no regard for evidence, established knowledge, or truth; Frankfurt, ) and the social conditions under which it is most likely to occur.
The sociological imagination as cliché: Perils of sociology and practices of journalism. International Journal of Political and Cultural Sociology, 20, Retrieved from Sociological Abstracts database.